@mgtrfelipeurrego , Metabase doesn't support this yet so if you want that functionality let them know by "liking" related posts in this forum and even more effectively "upvoting" the GitHub issue cited below. The Metabase team counts these up to gauge user interest for enhancements prioritizing those with more Likes and Votes.
opened 09:53AM - 21 Jul 17 UTC
closed 12:56AM - 10 Oct 20 UTC
Priority:P1
Reporting/Dashboards
Type:New Feature
Querying/Parameters & Variables
Currently, we have 5 filters added to our dashboard. Each filter is designed to … systematically filter the data displayed within the dashboard. The user will start with filter 1 and end with filter 5. We have the following filters with the corresponding number of options within each filter:
Filter 1 - 10 options
Filter 2 - 60 options
Filter 3 - 350 options
Filter 4 - 1,200 options
Filter 5 - 7,000 options
Based on the current design, it is very taxing to select 1 option from the list of 7,000 options. It would be a great idea to **create a filter that is 'filtered' based on the selection of another filter.** For example, filter 2 has 60 options, but only 6 relate to each option in filter 1. Ideally, when the user selects an option in filter 1, only the corresponding options are shown in filter 2, ie. 6 and not 60.
⬇️ **Please click the 👍 reaction instead of leaving a `+1` or 👍 comment**
Does Metabase already have this in v0.31.0? Have I overlooked something? Is it on the horizon? Is it on the radar? Is there a native workaround?
Highly dimensional data like say hundreds of products categorized by color, type, quality, etc. across multiple geographies organized by State, County, region, district, city, zip, etc. requires a bunch of different filters that often conflict. One filter for State and another for city and another for zip, for example, it’s normal to pick a State a…
1 Like